Tweetovi
- Tweetovi, trenutna stranica.
- Tweetovi i odgovori
- Medijski sadržaj
Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @LizaGoitein
Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @LizaGoitein
-
Prikvačeni tweet
So elegantly simple, it could almost be a tweet:pic.twitter.com/zaAP8n2VG6
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
They keep using that word "perfect." I do not think it means what they think it means.https://twitter.com/RFERL/status/1224028787190484993 …
0:18Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
OK, I have to ask... what even IS a “perfect phone call”??? You dial the numbers without error? Both parties successfully communicate words? No one accidentally hangs up before it’s over? What on earth could make a phone call “perfect”??
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Since war powers seem to be somewhat in the news these days... here are some remarks I made at an
@RSI event on the Hill in November, discussing Congress's role in military conflict and the growing gap between Constitutional principle and practice:https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/congresss-role-military-conflict-growing-gap-between-constitutional …Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
If Trump had deliberately set a goal for himself these past three months to do everything possible to empower the Islamic State, he couldn't have done a better job.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Important information about what the real justification for killing Suleimani was, and wasn't. Read the whole thread.https://twitter.com/rcallimachi/status/1213421769777909761 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
This should scare us all... a LOT. It's way past time for Congress to reclaim the constitutional warmaking power that it has allowed presidents to usurp.https://twitter.com/jacklgoldsmith/status/1213083362539266053 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Still, the panel's approach to backdoor searches represents a significant advance in Section 702 jurisprudence and an exciting victory for Americans' constitutional rights. Thanks to the
@ACLU for their excellent and tireless work on this incredibly important issue! 11/11Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
This misguided conclusion is based on a fundamental misreading of another line of cases, as I've written about in the American Criminal Law Review. It's a major constitutional misstep with potentially widespread implications. 10/11https://www.law.georgetown.edu/american-criminal-law-review/in-print/volume-55-issue-1-winter-2018/another-bite-out-of-katz-foreign-intelligence-surveillance-and-the-incidental-overhear-doctrine/ …
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
In essence, these courts have held that the lack of 4th Amendment rights for foreigners effectively extinguishes the rights of the Americans with whom they communicate, at least at the point of collection. 9/11
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
I have one other beef with the panel's decision: the Second Circuit joined the small but growing group of courts that have held that no warrant is needed for the initial collection of communications between foreign targets and Americans. 8/11
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
I wish the panel had gone further and explicitly stated that a warrant would be required unless one of the established exceptions to the warrant requirement (like "exigency") applied. That is certainly the general rule that the district court should follow on remand. 7/11
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Does that mean the government has to obtain a warrant to search Section 702 data for Americans' communications? The Second Circuit said that this depended on the circumstances, and it remanded to the district court to figure out what the circumstances were in this case. 6/11
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
The Second Circuit rejected this claim, and held that searches for Americans' communications constitute a separate, independent Fourth Amendment event. This conclusion tracks emerging case law regarding searches of already-collected digital data in various other contexts. 5/11
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
The government has argued that there are no Fourth Amendment implications when it conducts these searches, since the communications have already been collected. A few district courts have agreed with this simplistic argument. 4/11
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
"Backdoor searches" are when the government combs through data, collected without a warrant based on the govt's promise that it is targeting only foreigners overseas, to try to find Americans' communications to use against them in purely domestic criminal investigations. 3/11
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Besides the FISA Court, the Second Circuit is one of only a handful of courts to review the constitutionality of Section 702 surveillance. And it's the first federal appeals court to rule on the specific question of "backdoor searches." 2/11
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Congrats to
@ACLU on this important decision! Here are a few of my thoughts on the Second Circuit's opinion. 1/11https://twitter.com/PatrickCToomey/status/1207408574210682880 …
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
The FISA Court doesn't deserve its reputation as a "rubber stamp," but it hasn't exemplified rigorous judicial oversight, either. If it wants to demonstrate its worth to Congress, it must go further than it has in the past. 6/6
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.