Liscivia.ΞTH 🍯 ⚛️ve(¤,¤)┻┳

2/ Firstly and most importantly, liquid staking aligns incentives for the community to chose a staking provider that it's not centralized in nature, naturally removing delegations from CEXs to the benefit of the decentralization of the networks you chose to support

3/ Liquid staking also solves a big problem that is L1 liquidity, allowing for staked tokens to hit liquidity pools and chase further yeld.

4/ Now consider the holdings that the $TIME treasury already has in L1 tokens, those would be the first assets to be staked in a decentralized way. This would: A) Immediately create BIG earnings for the Treasury B) Allow for the liquid staking derivatives to be used for farming

5/ Where could frogs and possibly the Treasury, go farm with the liquid L1 tokens? Mmm... Maybe @SushiSwap? OFC there would be incentives for the DAO's LS derivative. This would: A) Create deep liquidity in 's pools/pairs B) Further incentivise @Wonderland_fi's staking solution

6/ C) Keep providing better incentives to move delegations off from CEX's D) Keep increasing the security of the networks by providing decentralization E) Keep attracting more capital into $TIME's treasury F) Keep driving revenue to the treasury and the community.

7/ OFC liquid staking is the future for every POS chain and everybody knows this, but @SushiSwap's becoming the most liquid Dex for liquid staking tokens is endgame. How do you think this would affect $MIM demand? Do you think the pairs would be in USDC?