When someone like @billmaher says he’s “not antivaccine,” I want to ask him: When a climate science denier claims he’s not denying that human-induced climate change is real, do you take that denial at face value? Or when a creationist say he’s not denying evolution?
He didn't say that vaccines don't work but that we don't know everything. Some vaccinations are important but we are overvaccinating now. And just as climate change denial is damaging so is vaccine injury denial.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Yes, we are. We need vaccines for serious diseases but not mild infections. How on earth did all of us in our mid-50s and over survive with only six vaccines while children today receive 16+ vaccines? Children are not healthier having more vaccines.
- Show replies
-
-
-
No, we’re not overvaccinating. Prove me wrong.
-
May you please point me to the list of robust & independent evaluations that confirm the efficiency, cohesiveness and accuracy of the USA's post-market surveillance/AE capturing systems? Thanks!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
That the vaccine schedule is constantly expanding with more and more vaccines for more and more infections. It would be better if they focused on the most important illnesses rather than continually adding more. There would be more uptake then.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Can you quantify that, i.e. "overvaccinating" ..? Citation? We'll wait. Thx
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Overvaccinating based on what exactly? A feeling? Thankfully the vaccination schedule is decided based on scientific evidence. And what do you think is a “mild infection” not worthy of vaccination? Think carefully about your answer...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But infectious disease denial is the most dangerous. Pestilence is one of the Four Horseman of the Apocalypse
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"And just as climate change denial is damaging so is... " vaccine science denial. FIXT. Odd that you are able to understand the logic of accepting the majority science position on climate change, but not vaccination. Do you see the dissonance here?
-
uhhhh.... the majority science on vaccines is that they are safe.... what’s you point??
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
, forest
&