what a surprise
-
-
-
Having existential questions on this thing. Maybe people are OK with 70% of games being on top 3? Isn't that what pros want, same maps every game? (LOL!) Maybe 3 A+ maps at 70% and 4 spicy/crazy maps at <30% is the way WCS should be? What is it even like to have an even pool? xD
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
Ten tweet jest niedostępny.
-
Probably just what you're hinting at here, it's on the edge of being standard. Didn't look into the stats but maybe it's a commonly picked mirror map? idk. The least eccentric one of the bottom 4 either way :D
Koniec rozmowy
-
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.
WCS Austin Main Event Map Performance
~What you see, on TV~
1 Lost and Found (+70.5%)
2 Acid Plant (+69%)
3 Catalyst (+53%)
4 Dreamcatcher (-4%)
5 16-Bit (-44%)
6 Redshift (-70%)
7 Darkness Sanctuary (-74%)
High/low ratio (1 vs 7): 6.53
Top 2 taking up ~50%, top 3 ~70%