nope. At least until we get to the bottom of Russia, Donald Trump SHOULD NOT get a SCOTUS seat.
-
-
-
why would you support seating a SCOTUS nom for a man who very likely might have colluded w Russia?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
honestly your party held up a qualified nominee for nearly a year because it was Obama and now w/ Trump under FBI

-NO WAYThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Because Obama couldn't have Gardland approved but
@realDonaldTrump can while he is under FBI InvestigationThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Never another person nominated by Trump. Senator, did you interview Garland?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Did you make the same appeal for qualified Supreme Court nominee Garland? Bipartisanship starts at home.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@LindseyGrahamSC Just like you voted for the 'qualified' Supreme Court nominee Garland? Oh... wait... he didn't even get a hearing. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Merrick Garland was supremely qualified but you wouldn't even give a vote so don't be so holier-than-thou!
-
that's it. You know voters will be here after Trump, after this nominee, might want to slow down the imperialism
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.