In my view, the system worked. At the tactical level, force protection was, as always, a priority and at the strategic level, the intelligence did not warrant presidential briefing or action by our country against Russia.
-
-
Deze collectie tonen
-
As to the President, the one thing that has been constant is his unwavering support to protect troops in the field.
Deze collectie tonen -
I’ve had my differences about the President’s decision to withdraw from some hotspots in the world, but I’ve never questioned his commitment to keep troops safe while they’re in harm’s way.
Deze collectie tonen -
The President was not briefed, as there appear to be contradictory analyses of the threat streams gathered by our intelligence community with the most reliable form of intelligence gathering being emphasized.
Deze collectie tonen -
The Russians have been involved in Afghanistan dating back to the previous administration and would prefer the United States to leave, thus filling the vacuum.
Deze collectie tonen -
I completely understand why the President was not briefed, and I completely understand why action against Russia based solely on this intelligence would be unjustified.
Deze collectie tonen -
To the Democrats who want to be harder on Russia: put forward your ideas. I will gladly look at them apart from this incident as I have long had major issues with Putin’s Russia.
Deze collectie tonen
Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
This debacle screams Class Action!
- Nog 1 antwoord
Nieuw gesprek -
-
Here's the ghost of Lindsey Graham discussing the military commanders' view of Trump's military rhetoric.
pic.twitter.com/O1oFQZqTt7 - Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.

