FACT: It was the House of Representatives who refused to pursue the testimony of the witnesses because they wanted to impeach the President before Christmas. Only in Washington would someone call that decision “Blocking Witnesses.”
-
-
Deze collectie tonen
-
In most of America it’s called:
#YourOwnFault.Deze collectie tonen
Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
The Senate has called an average of 33 witnesses in prior Impeachment trials. The least was 3 in Clinton's, but all of them were *recalled*; their testimony had already been heard. In Trump's case there are dozens of
#UnheardWitnesses w/ material testimony.pic.twitter.com/ugnFWGbkQZ
-
I’m so sad that future generations have to read about these clowns in history books.
Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
If you vote against calling more witnesses, you are "blocking witnesses"... that's literally what you're doing.
-
It is the Senate's job to try the case as given them. The House had every opportunity to subpoena any witness they wanted. They alone chose not to. That's on them. To little to late.
- Nog 1 antwoord
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
Hey, are you by any chance related to this Lindsey Graham? https://twitter.com/windsormann/status/1214594533847191552?s=21 …https://twitter.com/WindsorMann/status/1214594533847191552 …
0:20 -
I can’t help but wonder what Senator McCain would have thought about Graham’s BS these days...
- Nog 1 antwoord
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
The Senate has called an average of 33 witnesses in prior Impeachment trials. The least was 3 in Clinton's, but all of them were *recalled*; their testimony had been heard. In Trump's case there are dozens of
#UnheardWitnesses w/ material testimony. https://mobile.twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC/status/1222931962039603202 …pic.twitter.com/PAWFyKhX7Y
Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.