As to the whistleblower complaint -- the transcript speaks for itself – no quid pro quo. The Democrats bought a pig in a poke.
Show this thread
-
It is imperative we find out which White House official talked to the whistleblower and why. Why didn’t they lodge the complaint?
Show this thread
As to the other matters in complaint: Clearly a coordinated effort to take second-hand information to create a narrative damaging to the President. When I think of whistleblower complaints I generally think of someone with first-hand knowledge of the events in question.
-
-
As to the House of Representatives: If you believe this complaint has put the public in grave danger, don’t you have an obligation to vote to launch an impeachment inquiry? Americans deserve to see where you stand and evaluate your judgement.
Show this thread -
In 1998, the House of Reps – one month before a general election – voted to authorize an impeachment inquiry of President Clinton. It was bipartisan and received support from 31 Democrats. We voted then and House Democrats should vote now to start an impeachment inquiry.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Shame on you. Corrupt man.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Excatly. Key words "SECOND HAND INFORMATION".
-
THE IG's investigation confirmed the whistleblower's allegation with other WH officials. The second hand information became first hand information when the IG investigators asked them.
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
And Erin Brockavitch
End of conversation
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.