As to the whistleblower complaint -- the transcript speaks for itself – no quid pro quo. The Democrats bought a pig in a poke.
Show this thread
It is imperative we find out which White House official talked to the whistleblower and why. Why didn’t they lodge the complaint?
-
-
As to the other matters in complaint: Clearly a coordinated effort to take second-hand information to create a narrative damaging to the President. When I think of whistleblower complaints I generally think of someone with first-hand knowledge of the events in question.
Show this thread -
As to the House of Representatives: If you believe this complaint has put the public in grave danger, don’t you have an obligation to vote to launch an impeachment inquiry? Americans deserve to see where you stand and evaluate your judgement.
Show this thread -
In 1998, the House of Reps – one month before a general election – voted to authorize an impeachment inquiry of President Clinton. It was bipartisan and received support from 31 Democrats. We voted then and House Democrats should vote now to start an impeachment inquiry.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 1 more reply
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
OMG! This lackey is the Judicial Chair! WTF!
@harrisonjaime Do you believe this? Lindsey is attacking the whistleblower! He needs to be removed from the SenJud immediately!! All whistleblowers are protected by Federal Law!@KamalaHarris@ewarren@SenBooker - 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Lindsey, he asked for something and offered something in return. Quid pro quo means just that. It’s there.
#CorruptGOP - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.