Why blame it on some faceless entity like "Pentagon planners"? POTUS is commander in chief, and the buck stops there.
President @realDonaldTrump instincts to deliver a punishing blow to Syria’s Assad, after a second use of chemical weapons, was right.
Unfortunately, he was talked out of it by Pentagon planners who consistently underestimate the consequences of a weak response. (1)
-
New conversation
-
-
-
When it comes to Iran we have lost deterrence. To Pentagon planners: a weak response over this outrageous Iranian aggression only invites more aggression. It will also eventually lead to a nuclear arms race in the Middle East. Be Strong Now or pay a Bigger Price Later.
Show this thread -
I hope (but have my doubts) that Pentagon planners are giving President Trump a wide range of options that would punish Iran and restore deterrence. There are steps between being weak and total war.
Show this thread - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I prefer an honorable trustworthy educated man with actual experience in war like Gen Mattis's POV over either of you, Lindsey Graham or Donald Trump.pic.twitter.com/bG6AQCUGes
-
Even Lindsey Graham who saw Trump for who he is, jumped off the ship of reason to cozy up to power.
#LindseyGrahamFailsSC#LindseyGrahamResign#LeningradLindseypic.twitter.com/gbHFUUabua
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Ah, the good ole days!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There. Is. Always. A. Tweet.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.