Disappointed that #AlphaFold didn’t get references quite right- first washttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0028766 …
-
-
First part of your question is somewhat addressed in panel A of our paperpic.twitter.com/nw6GafIOSZ
-
Nice, thanks. Though it's still unclear how (statically) significant the improvement at low Neff is btw 12 and 13. I'd think it would be much cleaner if single methods and targets were evaluated at different (artificial) depths. I'm sure this analysis has been done.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
