Friendly reminder that any thot who would reject you because your penis *wasn’t* mutilated isn’t worth your time. Don’t mutilate your children’s penis for thots. Thanks.pic.twitter.com/mPr2P34BaU
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
If it was reprehensible we wouldn't have been doing it as a society for what, a thousands years?
Humans have enslaved and performed routine genocides against each other for thousands of years too, doesn’t make it right.
That's a garbage analogy. One thing is a part of culture (circumcision), one is you know... genocide. These things are not even remotely close to the same thing. You're a retard.
The Aztecs have performed genocides, human sacrifices and cannibalism as part of their “culture”. You’re pulling an appeal to tradition, and your arguments are entirely fallacious, and now you’re resorting to name calling. Sort yourself out.
Dismissing an argument because it's using a fallacy in itself is a fallacy. The Aztecs are what, thousands of years old? Even then I'm not pulling an appeal to tradition, I'm saying most people are okay with it.
Then you are pulling an appeal to popularity, an ad populum. Also, it’s not as popular as you think. Outside of America and certain religious groups, people don’t multilate their babies’ genitals.
I don't consider it mutilation. I prefer men circumcised, and I think people should choose whether they are circumcised or not, not their parents; but your original tweet is literally saying that me or anyone else are an asshole for preferring a circumcised dick. Seriously lol?
No, I’m saying people who only care about what your penis looks like is shallow and don’t matter. It’s up to you to decide if that definition applies to you or not.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.