My last tweet on this said “Stanford,” but the school is UCSD. H/t to Stanford med student @DylanPGriswold
Show this thread
Upper-level UCSD biology course says that a baby in the womb is "a legitimate parasite" that "invades" his/her mother, compares the baby to cancer. Pregnancy is NOT a disease and a baby is not a parasite. This is dehumanizing & false. Is this the best CA public education can do? https://t.co/OdXPWogBdq
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
New conversation
-
-
-
This is absurd. It’s scientifically inaccurate (let alone somewhat immoral) to describe a fetus as a parasite. This sort of intellectual dishonesty muddies the water of actual debate.
-
If treated as a parasite it allieviates any moral or ethical responsibility to care for the child before or after conception. This is how the post-modernist gets around Hippocratic oath.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
It's not like the mother was impregnated by some alien species against her will and had nothing to say when sex occurred.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The Nazis said the same thing about certain ethnicities ... nobody has a right to say who or when someone is a human .. it might start with babies and end with religious and/or political affiliations
-
God has that right and He has declared that you are human from the moment He knew you even before you were conceived in the womb. He knit you together in your Mother's womb, you are fearfully and wonderfully made.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Good God.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's not true. At all. It's in a parasite's best interest to make sure it's host thrives. Take a biology course. https://www.reference.com/science/don-t-parasites-kill-hosts-877cb46b4f80b32b …
- Show replies
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.