Lila Corwin Berman

@LilaCBer

Historian, jogger, soup and shoe enthusiast, and lover of fiction about relationships and messed up families

Vrijeme pridruživanja: listopad 2016.
2 fotografije ili videozapisa Fotografije i videozapisi

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @LilaCBer

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @LilaCBer

  1. 2. velj

    Capitalism profits from exploiting people's bodies. The exploitation is not a side show; it's the main feature.

    5 proslijeđenih tweetova 5 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    The entire Republican Party approves of this

    504 proslijeđena tweeta 2.189 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. sij

    Call your senators. No matter who they are, no matter what they’ve said, no matter if you just called them last week. Call your senators.

    431 reply 3.706 proslijeđenih tweetova 10.723 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  4. 27. sij

    50 years ago, Congress set in motion one of the most cataclysmic changes in the world of philanthropy: the donor-advised fund. My thoughts on how that happened and what it means for private v. public power.

    In the latest post in HIstPhil's forum on the Tax Reform Act of 1969, shows how the act paved the way for the spectacular rise of donor-advised funds
    4 proslijeđena tweeta 10 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    23. sij

    Hello, all. Here’s my latest!

    Non-Jewish right-wingers are in love with their imagined American Jewish community: placid, conformist, conservative and largely religious: Opinion
    5 proslijeđenih tweetova 15 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    28. pro 2019.

    Woke up to a New York Times op-ed about one group being intellectually superior to others and citing a paper co-authored by a white supremacist as evidence. The 2020s will be the most difficult decade in modern history. I hope we can face it with laughter and love.

    209 replies 2.384 proslijeđena tweeta 12.744 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  7. 17. pro 2019.

    "the executive order will not act to protect Jews — and it doesn’t aim to. On the contrary, its very promotion reinforces the most dangerous and hateful images of both modern and pre-modern anti-Semitism..."

    2 proslijeđena tweeta 2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  8. 12. pro 2019.

    Me on why, like it or not, Lauder's $25M pledge to fight antisemitism reveals the politics of Jewish philanthropy:

    3 proslijeđena tweeta 10 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    10. pro 2019.

    . + are world-class journalists but the needs to change this headline. Trump isn't targeting anti-Semitism. He's using a bogus definition of anti-Semitism to target critics of Israel

    180 replies 1.119 proslijeđenih tweetova 3.254 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  10. 9. pro 2019.

    Major Jewish Trump supporter gives $25M to solve antisemitism, notes he will monitor university professors and characterizes Trump as not having "an anti-Semitic bone in his body." Don't tell me philanthropy--or antisemitism--isn't political.

    16 proslijeđenih tweetova 54 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  11. 5. pro 2019.

    Castigating "the media" for not covering antisemitism; throwing shade on Bernie by calling Sarsour his surrogate; categorically equating anti-Zionism with antisemitism all seems like a textbook case of being coopted by the logic of the oppressor. No thanks, Bari Weiss.

    1 reply 7 proslijeđenih tweetova 38 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    20. stu 2019.

    This was brutal. I loved every second of it.

    1:08
    Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney out here with that strong New York Irish cop energy as he gets Sondland to say clearly that the investigations Trump wanted would benefit Trump
    Prikaži ovu nit
    467 replies 2.764 proslijeđena tweeta 13.567 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  13. 20. stu 2019.

    I haven't gotten so little done since the Kavanaugh hearings. And Nunes, you can take your Watergate nighttime fantasies and put them in the same dark place where you seem to have hidden your ability to feel shame.

    1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Poništi
  14. 15. stu 2019.

    An attack against against an ideology is not the same as an identitarian attack, and it can't be solved through call-out culture or State Department guidelines or legislative grandstanding.

    1 reply 10 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. 15. stu 2019.

    But if we take seriously the fact that it is an ideology (akin to liberalism or nationalism or socialism), with a complicated history, then we need to discuss content--what it should be, what it is.

    13 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. 15. stu 2019.

    If being a Zionist is just an identity, then we can parade it like an outfit, with little regard to what's inside of it--as the student does in the op-ed.

    1 reply 9 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. 15. stu 2019.

    Tepid-take (not fast enough to dish it hot) on the student's NYT op-ed: he's confusing ideology for identity. And he's not alone. We've become so fixated on proclaiming whether or not we are Zionists (h/t J institutions), that we have basically stopped talking about ideology.

    1 reply 3 proslijeđena tweeta 24 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    14. stu 2019.

    This piece is important on two fronts: 1) Yes, it's antisemitic to exclude Jewish students from groups unless they denounce Israel. 2) Mainstream Jewish community has contributed to problem by insisting that supporting Israel=supporting occupation.(1/3)

    41 reply 28 proslijeđenih tweetova 104 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. 11. stu 2019.

    Bernie Sanders in

    3 proslijeđena tweeta 3 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    26. lis 2019.

    Zuck a few days ago; Summers now. Good to get these justifications of concentrated wealth via philanthropy out into open. Bc if elite philanthropy is presented so clearly as alt to progressive taxation, then public has much more of stake in determining proper scope of giving.

    Forcing the wealthy to spend could boomerang. If the wealth tax had been in place a century ago, we would have had more anti-semitism from Henry Ford and a smaller Ford Foundation today.
    Prikaži ovu nit
    12 proslijeđenih tweetova 32 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi

@LilaCBer još nije objavio nijedan Tweet.

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·