Oh. My. This maps directly onto "Torture vs Dust Specs."
-
-
-
Replying to @WyrdOfMoon
@WyrdOfMoon The Ruby Code of Conduct Fracas. Two arguments: On the one side "we need to be more welcoming to marginalized people," vs...1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ContentOfMedia
@WyrdOfMoon on the other side, "You're making the whole community unwelcoming by increasing policing."1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ContentOfMedia
@WyrdOfMoon That is, one person eats the discomfort or ti's spread around. But << Torture and >> Dust Specks. But same root question.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ContentOfMedia
@ContentOfMedia Aha. Obvious solution is to set a firmament in the midst of the community, free speech on one side and tact on the other.>>1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @WyrdOfMoon
@ContentOfMedia Let individuals decide which side of the filter they want to interact with on any given day.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @WyrdOfMoon
@WyrdOfMoon@ContentOfMedia I think this sidesteps the issue meaninglessly, because only the minority has incentive to avoid marginalization1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LifeOfMyMoon
@LifeOfMyMoon@WyrdOfMoon Oh no, there are plenty of non-marginalized people who will choose tactful zone if offered the option.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ContentOfMedia
@LifeOfMyMoon@WyrdOfMoon The hard question is how you keep the clean side clean, and the other side clean enough.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@ContentOfMedia @WyrdOfMoon So many incentives, so few Schelling points
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.