Published and promoted by Mike Dixon on behalf of the Liberal Democrats, 8-10 Great George Street, London, SW1P 3AE
There is something wrong/misleading about this graph. Labour are spending much more, and all groups benefit more from LibDems compared to Labour? Is this just on some very specific metric that ignores the investments of Labour? What am I missing?
Our social security pledges are more progressive than Labour's and would see 600,000 fewer children in poverty than there would be under Conservative plans.
We will build a #BrighterFuture for Britain. More here > http://www.libdems.org.uk/plan https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-50554214 …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
hahhhahahahaah
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You lot started this with help from the Tory party now you want to fix, Not with my vote you won't
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
How? Would you nuke them
-
We are literally primed and waiting to press the red button. What else can we nuke? Perhaps Finland?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This is a campaign for votes. You win votes on a campaign - unless you're Theresa May in which case you lose them.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.