Lewend Mayiwar

@LewendM

1st year PhD candidate, Department of Leadership & Organizational Behavior .

Oslo, Norge
Vrijeme pridruživanja: studeni 2014.
15 fotografija ili videozapisa Fotografije i videozapisi

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @LewendM

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @LewendM

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    14. kol 2019.

    Very excited and grateful to see my first paper (replication) with published in the journal of Social Psychology.

    Issue 4/2019 is online. Including a paper by and aiming to replicate a study on the effects of high vs. low power on stereotyping (Lammers, , Stapel, 2009): Two of the original authors comment:
    1 reply 2 proslijeđena tweeta 7 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 12 sati

    New preprint! Integrating models of self-regulation With , Julia Briskin, & /1

    14 proslijeđenih tweetova 62 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 15 sati

    1/5 Effect sizes from lab experiments provide information about the strength of a causal relationship in that context, & are crucial in future study design & sample size planning. Baumeister: Yes, but we can't infer how strong or important those effects are in everyday life.

    Do Effect Sizes in Psychology Laboratory Experiments Mean Anything in Reality?
    1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 13 sati

    “You are not alone”—field experiment by et al finds that a low-cost intervention (a weekly email inviting people to advise a struggling colleague on a work challenge) can substantially reduce burnout and resignations: HT

    5 proslijeđenih tweetova 10 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    3. velj

    Paper👇🏻 by Baumeister makes some bold claims about what we can(‘t) learn from effect sizes. wrote an insightful response that also happens to be his (signed!) referee report from when the paper was under review elsewhere Read here:

    22 proslijeđena tweeta 42 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  6. 2. velj

    Interesting correlations between personality traits and music genre preferences. The first one (👇🏻) is quite surprising. Extraversion-->Blues Neuroticism-->Heavy Metal, Tropical, House and EDM Openness to experience-->Jazz, Classical, and Indie

    I min lille (N=111) uformelle pedagogiske studie ved foretrakk utadvendte Blues, de mindre emosjonelt stabile mer Heavy Metal, Tropical, House og EDM, og de mer åpne for nye erfaringer mindre listepop, men mer Jazz, Klassisk, og Indie-Rock.
    1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    New research replicates a classic XKCD finding! If we are disturbed when we encounter beliefs that differ from ours, it is not because we dislike different beliefs per se, but because we dislike others being *wrong*: HT

    1 reply 10 proslijeđenih tweetova 22 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    Why do we care about the file drawer? One reason is transparency.

    1 reply 2 proslijeđena tweeta 7 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    When you start a you are learning how to do research. You don't know how to do it so ask questions. Lots of questions. If you already knew how to do a PhD there wouldn't be any point in doing it. You are doing it to learn.

    9 replies 201 proslijeđeni tweet 772 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    If your field: i) tests hypotheses, ii) rewards successful hypotheses with career advancement, and iii) has no stringent mechanisms to prevent researcher biases influencing the evaluation of hypothesis tests, then I'm sorry to say that publication bias exists in your field

    5 replies 52 proslijeđena tweeta 175 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    🚨New paper online!🚨 in on cheating in the presence of a virtual observer with Jan Potters and Eline van der Heijden in the DAF Technology Lab here:

    1 reply 7 proslijeđenih tweetova 19 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    A new ranking system for academic journals measuring their commitment to research transparency will be launched next month;

    1 reply 25 proslijeđenih tweetova 50 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    Here are the slides for this open science talk Part 1 covers *why* you should adopt open science practices and Part 2 covers *how* you can do this, via a practical pre-registration exercise

    15 proslijeđenih tweetova 32 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    `PROCESS` macro was probably the only thing I "missed" since I switched from SPSS to and just found out that the `processR` 📦 lets you do just that! 😺🧮💪 Additional benefits: sweet tables and plots summarizing results! 🤩

    1 reply 17 proslijeđenih tweetova 73 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    28. sij

    👇🏼one of the reasons I love b-schools is that “sub areas of psych” don’t matter anymore. makes it much easier for interdisciplinary researchers to belong 👇🏼

    I'm starting to realize that I don't really fit into any specific subarea of psych. I thought dabbling in diff areas (soc, pers, health, cog) would be beneficial, but it's actually starting to feel isolating. People who have experienced something similar: how did you handle it?
    1 proslijeđeni tweet 45 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    27. sij

    "It's not about the money. It's about sending a message!": Unpacking components of revenge "people who would otherwise enact harsh punishments, are willing to punish less severely, if by doing so they can tell the transgressor why they are punishing them"

    6 proslijeđenih tweetova 10 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    27. sij

    I spent four years learning to run efficient regression analyses in R. Now I've written them into some handy functions so you won't have to.

    16 replies 277 proslijeđenih tweetova 1.166 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. 26. sij

    "We are at our best when our work informs evidence-based practice by challenging beliefs about the way the world works. Adopting open science furthers evidence-based practice (Banks et al., 2018)."

    In this entry of Opening Up – a column on The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist devoted to all things open science – I offer up a primer on open science to IO psychologists (). [1/6]
    Prikaži ovu nit
    2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    26. sij

    How fake science misleads managers: Predictors of leadership: The usual suspects and the suspect traits:

    How many other tools are in the same status as MBTI?
    4 proslijeđena tweeta 19 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    26. sij

    Good advice from the 17th century: to persuade people, don’t tell them they’re wrong, but show them they haven’t looked at all angles. Excellent by Blaise Pascal (who also suggests: let them discover new insights themselves). HT

    1 reply 6 proslijeđenih tweetova 12 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  21. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    26. sij

    Great video but.....the MBTI should not even be taken for entertainment. Paying to use a bogus test, and legitimizing it in the process, is unethical.

    The MBTI is useful for one thing only: entertainment!
    11 proslijeđenih tweetova 29 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi

@LewendM još nije objavio nijedan Tweet.

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·