...what? i don't understand what you're saying. I'm saying that advertisers only use what isn't contentious. I agree that the discussion around Greta and sex trafficking is contentious.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @ohprogressive @Aella_Girl
So... what? What are you talking about? I'm not saying that as like a mere put down, I mean your chain of thought is not followable.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
She's agreeing and supporting that if a minor addresses the UN, then they're magically good to go with being forced into sex slavery.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I think Aella was supporting the idea that 16 year olds probably aren't mature enough to say anything worth hearing on climate change. Not that magic and sorcery exist.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Not if you read all of her replies on the thread. The point of me saying magic was hyperbole, by the way. Pointing out a lapse in judgement on her behalf.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I know what Aella thinks about stuff like this. I've talked to her in real life. She thinks that maybe we have weird inconsistent concepts about maturity and we should think about that. She's not trying to say your heinous strawman.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
And yet she defended saying that children who speak at the UN should be okay to be fixed into sex slavery.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I literally do not think 16 year olds should be fixed into sex slavery.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
She thinks that maybe we have weird inconsistent concepts about maturity and we should think about that. She thinks maybe 16 year olds don't have the maturity to lead a convo on climate change. She doesn't support sex trafficing. THIS IS OBVIOUS. WHY DO I HAVE TO EXPLAIN?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.