She is so clueless and stressed out you need to take it easy on her.https://twitter.com/Monsantobuster/status/1156232905192026112 …
-
-
Replying to @nntaleb
On the contrary Mr Taleb, you’re helping to make me antifragile, keep going.
43 replies 30 retweets 710 likes -
Replying to @clairlemon @nntaleb
I think Quillette should have a widget that covers the Daily Lehman-Taleb Twitter Fight
10 replies 1 retweet 82 likes -
Replying to @anarchomorphist @clairlemon
Fucking moron it's not a fight: it's watching her do self-flagellation, which gets painful once it starts eliciting commiseration.
27 replies 13 retweets 173 likes -
Claire is not pushing a "human biodiversity" agenda, but even if she thought, empirically, that there were average differences between populations, that would not make her a "neonazi." Why are you throwing around labels so carelessly?
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @LevelOAnalysis @nntaleb and
Who cares, the important thing is she was baited into responding and in going so removing any remaining shred of doubt that she's an utter IYI. "They can’t tell science from scientism — in fact in their image-oriented minds scientism looks more scientific than real science."
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TrevorSutcliffe @nntaleb and
Taleb comes across much worse in the exchange. I don't what you are talking about.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @LevelOAnalysis @nntaleb and
Trevor Sutcliffe Retweeted Claire Lehmann
Ah yes, she was in really fine form when she argued that you can't dispute the way social scientists make unsound assumptions and employ statistical techniques copped from probability theory by making mathematical arguments based in probability theory.https://twitter.com/clairlemon/status/1156034873934508035?s=20 …
Trevor Sutcliffe added,
Claire LehmannVerified account @clairlemonYou can't debunk the predictive utility of a diagnostic test with mathematical theory. The test is either predictive real world outcomes or it is not. In the rush to be a philosophers of science some people forget to be actual scientists. https://twitter.com/Monsantobuster/status/1156027566349664258?s=20 …2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @TrevorSutcliffe @LevelOAnalysis and
Trevor Sutcliffe Retweeted Claire Lehmann
Even better was the tweet where she straight-up said she doesn't know how to distinguish science from scientism.https://twitter.com/clairlemon/status/1156164287595012102?s=20 …
Trevor Sutcliffe added,
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @TrevorSutcliffe @nntaleb and
"They will draw this indictment: conflation, simplism, ontological reduction- ism, scientism, and other sins made official by the hissing suffix. To which I plead guilty, guilty, guilty. Now let us move on" - EO Wilson
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
If she actuallly doesn't know what scientism is that's not good, but it's worse to unjustifiably call someone a neo-nazi.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.