Medijski sadržaj
- Tweetovi
- Tweetovi i odgovori
- Medijski sadržaj, trenutna stranica.
-
Here's another example of a media outlet using the terms "win, winner, winning" for today's Iowa Democratic caucus results that is simply not appropriate and misinforms the public about the real state of play. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/03/upshot/needle-iowa-caucuses-faq.html … cc:
@Nate_Cohn@jshkatz@KevinQpic.twitter.com/urJvMMWJ9u
Prikaži ovu nit -
Fwiw - Too many use the word "win" to describe taking only a modest % of the caucus vote. For example, should Bernie take 25% of the vote, that means 75% didn't choose him. Also anything short of Bernie's 2016 Iowa caucus 49.59% should also inform us all. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Iowa_Democratic_caucuses#Results …pic.twitter.com/SgRIbeYCDl
-
JFC! "Armed officers, who were part of a proactive counter-terrorism surveillance operation and were following the suspect on foot, were in immediate attendance and shot a male suspect dead at the scene." http://news.met.police.uk/news/further-statement-from-dac-lucy-dorsi-following-incident-in-streatham-393190 …pic.twitter.com/Dix3hNBX6Q
Prikaži ovu nit -
@DavidMDrucker Fwiw, in the event of such a "tie", I'd bet VP Pence, as the formal President of the Senate, and explicitly constitutionally authorized to break voting ties would object to any Roberts' tie-breaking vote and replace it with his own. https://www.senate.gov/civics/constitution_item/constitution.htm#a1_sec3 …pic.twitter.com/W87Yy6ZtLq
-
Fwiw - Irt your story's point about the "surprising' lack of perimeter security": 1. In the piece by
@Tmgneff@EricSchmittNYT@charlie_savage &@helenecooper https://twitter.com/EricSchmittNYT/status/1219951261006602240 …, US sent "about 100 troops from the 101st Airborne Division to establish security at the base."pic.twitter.com/09BJsXsG7B
-
If anyone is still expecting Senate GOPers like Collins, Gardner, Murkowski and Romney to do the right thing by voting for witnesses in Trump's impeachment trial, "Abandon hope all ye who enter here." That is appearing more and more unlikely: https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/30/politics/impeachment-state-of-play-witness-votes/index.html …pic.twitter.com/7HP5a6qNPT
-
Ha! It's a real PITA and I won't finish tonight, but as Chief Dan George said in "Josey Wales", I will endeavor to persevere!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hRX6hSGeZs4 …
-
1. Sorry for the late, late night tweet, but I think this ¶ is constitutionally incorrect despite the precedent in the 1868 impeachment trial of Andrew Johnson. Bear with me as I attempt to explain.pic.twitter.com/0wwV6CQNii
-
Hahahahahahahahahahahaha...hiccup...hahahahahahahahahahahaha! Rudy the Backstabber calling someone else a backstabber is the epitome of self-own. https://twitter.com/davecclarke/status/1221980937161969664 …pic.twitter.com/PwhG2IMqeK
-
My point was something far worse:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dMt8qCl5fPk …
-
Something that has been on my mind and I've not seen an answer to it is whether there is any role for VP Pence as the President of the Senate voting in a 50-50 split. Is there any role at all for VP Pence as the President of the Senate in an impeachment trial? If not, why not?pic.twitter.com/s6MkGUTMBT
-
Cruising the virtual universe tonight with virtuoso guitarist Marc Seal and his Above The Clouds (Part 1) track. I'm surprised that he's only had this album up on YouTube since this past November. Stellar guitar playing!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=reeSMKsnSyM …
-
5. To this ¶ that implies far more than the polling actually shows. Sanders' 25% versus the combined total of 64% for a candidate other than Sanders. 25% < 64%! Fwiw, I don't call that "winning".pic.twitter.com/NOsk50VsZq
Prikaži ovu nit -
4. Compare this ¶ that shows a center-moderate lean to the voters' preferences.pic.twitter.com/tRlhmsFP8P
Prikaži ovu nit -
2. First off, the latest "polling". It does show Sanders ahead, but it's really far more nuanced and complicated. The combined total of voters for candidates other than Warren and Sanders is 49% versus the 40% for the combined Warren & Sander total. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/25/us/politics/democratic-iowa-poll-sanders.html …pic.twitter.com/r0zeFNXLXC
Prikaži ovu nit -
Sounds like Esper's force level review of
@USAfricaCommand happens tomorrow:pic.twitter.com/RKzpcDBMOt
Prikaži ovu nit -
Did you take this as a "pushback"? Seems like your reporting still stands! https://thehill.com/policy/defense/479651-us-military-releases-new-details-of-kenyan-base-attack-that-left-3-dead …pic.twitter.com/f0kH8BFifj
-
As I tweeted yesterday, the Senate GOP leadership's marching orders are blindingly simple: "It ain't a crime and it didn't happen." https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/20/politics/trump-senate-trial-defense/index.html …pic.twitter.com/QWeshijklN
Prikaži ovu nit -
Maggie, Maggie, Maggie!
Like Maggie's insistence to me in Campaign 2016 that "everybody!!!" is talking & concerned about Hillary's emails!!!
It wasn't true then just as this isn't true now.
But Maggie's bubble is impervious to anything that Maggie herself doesn't believe.pic.twitter.com/uOPDoNB5qj
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.