Lemon Slayer

@LemonSlayerUS

When you're handed lemons, make lemonade! Veteran & Progressive. Au contraire...

US
Vrijeme pridruživanja: lipanj 2014.

Medijski sadržaj

  1. 3. velj

    Here's another example of a media outlet using the terms "win, winner, winning" for today's Iowa Democratic caucus results that is simply not appropriate and misinforms the public about the real state of play. cc:

    Prikaži ovu nit
  2. 3. velj

    Fwiw - Too many use the word "win" to describe taking only a modest % of the caucus vote. For example, should Bernie take 25% of the vote, that means 75% didn't choose him. Also anything short of Bernie's 2016 Iowa caucus 49.59% should also inform us all.

  3. 2. velj

    JFC! "Armed officers, who were part of a proactive counter-terrorism surveillance operation and were following the suspect on foot, were in immediate attendance and shot a male suspect dead at the scene."

    Prikaži ovu nit
  4. 30. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima

    Fwiw, in the event of such a "tie", I'd bet VP Pence, as the formal President of the Senate, and explicitly constitutionally authorized to break voting ties would object to any Roberts' tie-breaking vote and replace it with his own.

  5. 30. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima

    Fwiw - Irt your story's point about the "surprising' lack of perimeter security": 1. In the piece by & , US sent "about 100 troops from the 101st Airborne Division to establish security at the base."

  6. 30. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci
  7. 30. sij

    If anyone is still expecting Senate GOPers like Collins, Gardner, Murkowski and Romney to do the right thing by voting for witnesses in Trump's impeachment trial, "Abandon hope all ye who enter here." That is appearing more and more unlikely:

  8. 30. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Ha! It's a real PITA and I won't finish tonight, but as Chief Dan George said in "Josey Wales", I will endeavor to persevere!

  9. 28. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    1. Sorry for the late, late night tweet, but I think this ¶ is constitutionally incorrect despite the precedent in the 1868 impeachment trial of Andrew Johnson. Bear with me as I attempt to explain.

  10. 28. sij

    Hahahahahahahahahahahaha...hiccup...hahahahahahahahahahahaha! Rudy the Backstabber calling someone else a backstabber is the epitome of self-own.

  11. 28. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    My point was something far worse:

  12. 28. sij

    Something that has been on my mind and I've not seen an answer to it is whether there is any role for VP Pence as the President of the Senate voting in a 50-50 split. Is there any role at all for VP Pence as the President of the Senate in an impeachment trial? If not, why not?

  13. 26. sij

    Cruising the virtual universe tonight with virtuoso guitarist Marc Seal and his Above The Clouds (Part 1) track. I'm surprised that he's only had this album up on YouTube since this past November. Stellar guitar playing!

  14. 26. sij

    5. To this ¶ that implies far more than the polling actually shows. Sanders' 25% versus the combined total of 64% for a candidate other than Sanders. 25% < 64%! Fwiw, I don't call that "winning".

    Prikaži ovu nit
  15. 26. sij

    4. Compare this ¶ that shows a center-moderate lean to the voters' preferences.

    Prikaži ovu nit
  16. 26. sij

    2. First off, the latest "polling". It does show Sanders ahead, but it's really far more nuanced and complicated. The combined total of voters for candidates other than Warren and Sanders is 49% versus the 40% for the combined Warren & Sander total.

    Prikaži ovu nit
  17. 23. sij

    Sounds like Esper's force level review of happens tomorrow:

    Prikaži ovu nit
  18. 23. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:
  19. 20. sij

    As I tweeted yesterday, the Senate GOP leadership's marching orders are blindingly simple: "It ain't a crime and it didn't happen."

    Prikaži ovu nit
  20. 16. sij

    Maggie, Maggie, Maggie!🙄 Like Maggie's insistence to me in Campaign 2016 that "everybody!!!" is talking & concerned about Hillary's emails!!! It wasn't true then just as this isn't true now. But Maggie's bubble is impervious to anything that Maggie herself doesn't believe.

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·