The Senate is institutionalized white supremacyhttps://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2020/08/the-senate-is-institutionalized-white-supremacy …
-
-
Backing up a bit, most of the framers of the 14th Amendment thought its most important provisions were not Section 1 but Section 2 (which orders Congress to strip representation from states that disenfranchise otherwise eligible voters) https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2483355 …
Show this thread -
This was because they understood that no matter how precisely you worded the rights they would only be as good as the judges and legislators interpreting them. And from the Slaughterhouse Cases to Shelby County, this has repeatedly been proven correct.
Show this thread -
But while Radical Republicans feared the civil war amendments would be gutted if Southern Democrats took over the government, the amendments were actually gutted by Republican judges, and Republican legislators refused to enforce Section 2. And this brings us to the Senate.
Show this thread -
Stevens and the other Radicals weren't naive; they knew a lot of northern Republicans were not racial egalitarians. They expected Section 2 to be enforced not so much out of a principled commitment to political equality as to sheer political self-interest.
Show this thread -
Because of the abolition of the 3/5ths clause, if southern states disenfranchised African-Americans and Section 2 wasn't enforced, as things stood in 1870 Democrats basically would have had a hammerlock on the federal government.
Show this thread -
Expanding the Senate, however, meant that Republicans could write off the South and still be competitive. So the Senate is critical to explaining why Republican support for civil rights sharply attenuated after 1874 and vanished entirely after 1891.
Show this thread -
In short, the only "norm" expanding the Senate would violate would be that in the past partisan expansions were done to exacerbate white supremacy rather than alleviating it. I don't think that's a norm worth preserving!
Show this thread -
In conclusion, statehood for D.C. and a statehood referendum for Puerto Rico are not merely defensible but an urgent moral necessity.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Had to scroll down all the way to the bottom to find a rational thought in this thread. Thank you for providing, Deb.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.