The fact that the factional strategy even looked like it had a *chance* to work is solely an artifact of an anachronistic primary calendar front-loaded with states with few African-American voters. If we started with South Carolina and Michigan Bernie never would have led.
-
-
Show this thread
-
Or, at least, would not have led using the same approach. If South Carolina was before Iowa, it seems unlikely that he would have delegated the SC operation to a Stein '16 voter with no serious connection to the state. Another reason to get rid of the ridiculous primary calendar.
Show this thread -
It's also worth noting that even if you DID succeed in grinding out a nomination with a third of the vote and little African-American support, the nomination would be a poisoned chalice that would probably result in a failed presidency, but that's another thread.
Show this thread -
One other point. The model behind this doomed strategy seems to be Trump '16, but was Trump actually a factional candidate? Is there any evidence he would have lost a national ranked choice vote or a head-to-head with Jeb! or Rubio?
Show this thread -
The idea that Trump was factional basically represents both Republican elites and a lot of the media being in denial over the obvious fact that racism is a lot more popular among Republican voters than...literally any orthodox economic policy being offered by the party.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It was a terrific article!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
That's was the strategy of Elizabeth Warren.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.