See: Medicine Also see: History If you wish to refute the WHO, AMA, and ACOG, go ahead. But try to use facts and not fantasy. https://twitter.com/Pro_life_NRCHY/status/1131785315214143490 …
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Where have I claimed that DS aren't people? If that syllogism replaced the number 46 with 45-47, then it still stands that unborn children are human. "You should not assert..." You, Leah, should not accuse people of dehumanizing others when you dehumanize unborn children.
I hope you feel like you’ve achieved something here.
Human beings are pregnant with human beings. Well done, you are wise beyond your years. 
-
-
Before changing the topic to elementary level banter, guessing that science proves that unborn children are people, right?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Then how can you do what you do? Not “why”. I’m understand your why. But how?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@LeahNTorres you are da bomb haha. Now that@IntelligentCan2 has acknowledged the basics maybe he's ready to admit the next obvious point: some human beings are okay to kill but others aren't. After that he'll be on his way to supporting repro rights. -
Think she’ll notice?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
-
Well, in the sense that one is actual and one is potential. I primarily value the life of the actual human being in front of me.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
How about letting your fellow murderers in on this wisdom? Because a lot of them are too deceived to realize. Thanks.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.