Je kan informatie over je locatie aan je Tweets toevoegen, bijvoorbeeld je stad of exacte locatie, via het web en applicaties van derden. Je kan altijd de locatiegeschiedenis van je Tweets verwijderen. Meer informatie
We know multiple whistleblowers (scientists/docs) in #Wuhan tried to alert society re #COVID19 early on, but were ignored, even sanctioned. Did @WHO actively use its IHR, Arts 9-10 powers to seek access to such "unofficial" data sources? Or did it primarily rely on govt reports?
In wake of #SarsCov, @WHO revised IHR. Perhaps most imp reform was it could now use "unofficial" data sources of epi value. Why didn't it actively do so w/ #COVID19製造機? If WHO had actionable info early on of a novel coronavirus, could #COVIDOutbreak have been contained?
Should journalists/docs/civil society proactively alert WHO if they believe a novel virus has emerged? Encouraging unofficial reporting would be useful, & that is what IHR envisaged. There's a key problem w/ #IHR however. Whistleblowers cannot be fully assured of confidentiality.pic.twitter.com/aPhfb8uQic
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.
