@LawrenceGostin IHR could have scope to apply human rights obligations to local populations but States also have human rights obligations during health crises.
WHO opposes travel bans w/o evi re #COVID19 yet praises China. Does #IHR apply to actions states apply to own citizens? China is violating HRs, key to IHR. Art 43 focused on travellers, not internal rights violations. What does IHR require? Shouldn't it apply to domestic actions?pic.twitter.com/Kojs4bxUIf
2 antwoorden
11 retweets
23 vind-ik-leuks
-
-
-
Absolutely - regardless of this is a breach of IHR the actions of China are disproportionate and authoritarian. Human rights are embedded across all WHO work streams and Tedros’ tenure as DG, and the agency should condemn China’s actions.
- Nog 1 antwoord
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
@WHO opposes travel bans but the people demand it. We have HR too.Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.