Important, compelling, provocative article. FWIW (probably nil!), I have some thoughts. First, some disclaimers: I’ve received research grants from many organizations mentioned (WHO, Gavi, Gates, Global Fund) & I’ve worked on multidisciplinary teams that included consultants 1/
-
-
-
I’ve worked with consultants (e.g., who are MDs or PhDs or MD PhDs!) who genuinely know more, technically & scientifically, about a health issue than any academic I know. So I think it is important to ask: does this professional have skills to bring to the team? 2/
- Nog 5 antwoorden
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
And, does the WHO or Gates pay enough attention to conflicts of interest, that McKinsey, BCG, et, have.
- Nog 2 antwoorden
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
Irony is that the
@gatesfoundation people working w/ & w/i@WHO & the PPPs mostly don’t see@McKinsey’s input as good value for money. Seems to be a growing feeling w/i BMGF that they need to reign this back@buissonnierem -
& in cases I look at, at least, (
#WHO,#GPEI,#RBM) the push to reform- & to do it the@McKinsey way- came as much from USG as from@gatesfoundation Restructuring is ritual behavior, way more pervasive & deeply embedded than just Gates’ influence accounts for
Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
I think the article answers your questions.
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
NO. WHO staff should have competence & accreditation on public health projects,programs and systems design, leadership and management. Lazy use of generic management consultants results only in beautifull powerpoints and reports undermine organizational integrity &performance
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.