Member States need to contribute more so that @WHO can do its job- provide independent technical advice and support to all countries around the world. Being run by donor funds (Gates included) that set the agenda is completely wrong and inappropriate-public good must come first
Overall @WHO budget is less than the budget for a single US hospital! Worse still, @WHO controls only .25% of its already minuscule budget. All the rest is earmarked donor funds. No organization can thrive w/o sustainable funding commensurate w/ worldwide responsibilitieshttps://twitter.com/MartenRobert/status/1108260761510522880 …
-
-
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
NYC’s Health Department budget is about $1.7 billion for 8 million people - that does not include the budget for the public hospital / healthcare delivery system, which has a separate budget ~$1B. What should the budget be for 8 billion people?
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
It is not how much funds WHO has, it is for what reasons WHO is needed. As countries®ions find more competence &better resources, it is not necessary to have head heavy organisation. UN & WHO encourages uncivil practice as tax free salaries. whole world pay tax why not WHO.
-
Excellent point. CAPE Vulnerability Index offers a structured, reasoned , evidenced approach towards global funding & priorities. Geo-Political Determinants of Health is the new approach .
Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
Are you sure on .25??
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
We ask much and provide little. There's only so much that a "do more with less" attitude can take you. We've seen the shortcomings already, in spite of best intentions.
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.