driving a car in tunnels literally removes several of the top reasons of car crashes huffpost.com/entry/top-15-c
you're wrong
Conversation
Well the cars come out of the tunnels and go to the stations---also cars themselves have inherent risks of combustion/catastrophic failure, all of which are far greater than trains.
1
1
cars stay in tunnel until service ends. they're next to the parking lot so none of that street specific crashes apply but even if it did, no other passengers are hurt.
trains cars don't have catastrophic failure? derailment? again you're ignoring what applies to trains
2
1
Specifically here, with these outside stations. You can see that there are tons of points where pedestrians cross right in front of Teslas, and the Teslas even engage with traditional cars along this point.
1
1
what does this have to do with anything? where's your data that pedestrian crosswalks at car station loops have lots of injuries?
1
1
It is obvious if you look at the layout of those stations. You cannot really get to the center collection point without crossing the road. We don't have data on injuries, but I expect them to be fairly comparable to ride sharing in general.
1
"you expect"
again lots of guessing and no actual proof. your hate for elon clouds your judgement.
2
1
Let's be clear. It is a small tunnel with a taxi service. That is all. It will be worse than what we already have in public transport in every aspect, except it creates more jobs (although many times more expensive for the user)
1
Yeah, I have no idea how this system is significantly better than just giving everyone at the convention an app called "Uber" to use for ride sharing. XD
2
1
You've never experienced Uber surge pricing at major shows, apparently
1
Why would this not happen for what is basically underground uber?
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Show