“Works as designed”.
Why would you want to add more costs to do more than what it is designed for? That’s how you get billion dollar project costs 🤮
Conversation
Solution to a problem that didn't exist.
1
solving the 45 minute walk to just a few minute ride actually
2
The funny thing though is the extreme cost of this "System" also, the fact that they have to pay drivers, it isn't automated, and the tunnels do not have any ventilation or safety features so if there's a fire people will literally suffocate.
1
1
It’s $160 million cheaper than the next cheapest proposal which was $215 million for a rail system.
Automated was never promised in the contracts. Tunnels do have ventilation and safety features.
You’re just flat out wrong here.
1
Actually, you are making stuff up---they are under their promised capacity for the system because the system doesn't meet the fire spec regulations for the promised rate.
techcrunch.com/2020/10/16/elo
2
1
'Testing'. They reached it in testing. 🤣
1
Which makes the tech crunch complete bullshit as fire code didn’t prevent them from reaching that number.
1
In a 'test'. 🤣
1
That’s what you do to confirm capacity. How else would you confirm capacity?
1
In real life? You run it during a busy time, following all the rules and see where you get. Max capacity during a closed test means fuck all.
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Show