Also, trains are way more efficient.
Conversation
trains cost billions
boring company tunnels cost 100x less
if you don’t have the money to build a train, trains are useless.
1
You are wrong. So very wrong.
2
lol try again
1
Yep then divide cost by capacity and reliability. 👍
2
The tunnels will run on rubber tires and a road, rather than lines. That makes running costs much higher and less environmentally friendly. Think about road works, but in a small tunnel with a heavy vehicle passing over the same spot every few seconds.
Also all the rubber.
2
1
Also, for example, the SFCS (at the top) is over the entire life of the project and it includes much more than just the underground. It will have roughly 50million passengers a year.
2
The new Vegas Loop will do 57k per hour capacity. At 24/7 operation, can be up to 500 million per year capacity. Conservative number too.
1
Mmmm. Sat in a stinky ass small car that has had millions of people sat in. Be easy to clean too. 🤣🤣 The current one in Vegas is a shit show.
2
No1 will piss in a tesla?
You’re arguing that a Tesla would be “stinky ass”. Subway has the same issue.
Tesla cars can simply drive out of the system to clean and another one from the parking lot can drive in.
1
Is a car easy to clean? How long does a full valet take?
Cleaning a subway is a bucket and a mop.
2
Show replies