FFS 

-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Disgraceful and public trust will continue to suffer!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Again, we must encourage consumers to be smart, to seek the truth, to do their own checking and double checking, esp on vital issues. Exhausting but extra necessary these days.
-
We should also try to set some realistic goals though or we will be disillusioned.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Bad look
@WSJhealth@WSJscience@WSJeditor and yes I know the opinion section purports to be independent of news, but it’s all Murdoch and it’s all in the same plastic wrap -
WSJ = FoxNews Print. (and I subscribe but thinking about not renewing.)
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I agree this is pretty silly. Then again, what would you rather have? Every layman to be able to read a scientific monograph and reach their own conclusion? I believe that to be dangerous as well.
-
It's also the WSJ, so little credibility on their end anyways.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The WSJ has lost all credibility. I will never look at it again. Shame on them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The bought the media at the same time they bought politicians. It was a sale...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.