The 15,000-member California union says Warren got 61% while Sanders had 50% in the balloting, which let members make up to three choices. The union had endorsed Sanders in the 2016 race. Harris got 34%, Biden got 32%, and Buttigieg got 21%.
-
-
Show this thread
New conversation -
-
-
Unclear from article-do you know if the co endorsement was based on a pre decided formula (ie anyone who hits 50%) or post hoc subjective call?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The
@DNC can’t win the election against@realDonaldTrump without the#BlackVote!#Blackwomen should withhold their VOTE in exchange for SOVEREIGNTY! Only SOVEREIGNTY protects the#BlackFamily from America’s domestic policies!#Blackmen#Blackmen#8StatesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wow, endorsing a Kaiser money-taking, non-
#MedicareForAll, picket line scab is quite a move for a healthcare union. -
And her campaign has not agreed to a contract with it's employees...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So the leadership overruled the rank-and-file to force Warren to share the endorsement with Bernie over the objections of half of their members

-
Yep. And the outcome was transparent, so that people could make their own decisions about the value of the endorsement.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So the Union doesn’t want M4all single payer implemented?! That’s what I’m getting from this article-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.