Hypothetical question, how much of a game do you need to play before you are allowed to give a review on it?
Show this thread
I think you need to finish the main campaign to give a proper review, anything less would be a 'first impressions'. As a reviewer, you are supposed to tell us if the game as a whole is worth it. The reviewer does it so you don't have to. If they don't -
-
-
then they don't know much more about the game than the person reading the review. You can give your opinion on a game before beating it, but I think a review of someone who played less than half of a game should be valued less than someone who gave the game a proper full look.
-
This is for unpaid reviewers btw, stuff like metacritic etc btw
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.