basics! 2/4pic.twitter.com/8feZxgp478
Show this thread
-
The frustrating part is you can qualify under fair use, meet 4 principles, and still deal with content owners disputing you, shooting down your defence to stifle you, and see them face no repercussions.
Well, there is laws that a copyright holder must consider if the derivative is fair use before filing a claim, and could face repercussions if shown they did not. But like any legal dispute, it can only be determined im court, which can be expensive.
-
-
Whether in bad faith, for censorship, or as some music groups had done - to dash with someone else's revenue before YouTube updated how they handle adrev. There have been incredibly few examples of false DMCA's or misunderstanding of the system actually led to consequence.
-
Yeah, I'm not saying the system is perfect, I've even been hit with wrong DMCAs and claims. Though, just about the only way they can get some kind of consequence is to pay to bring them to court, that is true for just about any wrong thing someone can do. Most people get- 1/2
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
True - but any content creator can absolutely give you several examples of when it's become clear that the copyright holder has not made such consideration, or blatantly ignored it, to file claims on content (continued)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.