Lady Freethinker

@john19071969 That site just expresses a need for ongoing research, doesn't advocate GMOs. Why do you defend them so?

@LadyFreethinker I would mention that while you tossed off Mark Lynas, he was the only journalist who analysed the pig study right.

@john19071969 The pig study is not the basis for my logic - and do you champion every product until someone shows you not to?

@LadyFreethinker the anti-GMO movement has irrational hysteria and as we see in other movements, such as the anti vaccine movement,

@john19071969 Yes, it does. Still, it's not smart to rapidly change the landscape/food supply with GMOs before due testing. That's my point.

@john19071969 And while vaccines have medical purpose, GMOs are churned out to line Big Agriculture's pockets, not for our own health.

@LadyFreethinker anti vaxers make the argument that vaccines are to "line the pockets of Big Pharma?" How is that an argument?

@john19071969 My argument, which you keep ignoring, is it's unwise to rapidly change the landscape/food supply with GMOs before due testing.