@john19071969 Yes, but it isn't feasible to analyze each GMO in a product. Safer to just avoid, IMO
-
-
Replying to @LadyFreethinker
@LadyFreethinker you are implying that no studies have been done http://www.geneticliteracyproject.org/2013/10/08/with-2000-global-studies-confirming-safety-gm-foods-among-most-analyzed-subject-in-science/#.UlW9tqa9LCQ …2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @john19071969
@john19071969 And despite what that site says, some studies do show harm http://www.organic-systems.org/journal/81/8106.pdf …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LadyFreethinker
@LadyFreethinker interesting. Here is a commentary on that paper http://www.marklynas.org/2013/06/gmo-pigs-study-more-junk-science/ …2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @john19071969
@john19071969 One could just as easily pick apart the research touting GMO safety. Who funded most of those studies?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LadyFreethinker
@LadyFreethinker so now you are slipping into denialism. You will accept a bad paper in a fake journal, over hundreds of bonafide studies1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @john19071969
@john19071969 The only evidence you sent was from a non-scientist group who, according to founder's wiki, "merely offers their own opinions"1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @john19071969
@john19071969 You still have not shown me long-term health and environmental safety research on GMOs.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LadyFreethinker
@LadyFreethinker Here is literature review in Food and Chemical Toxicology http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278691511006399 …. They conclude that GMOs are ok2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@john19071969 It's smarter not to flood the market with GMOs prematurely. All I'm saying - and I think true scientist would agree.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.