To be clear--still time to drop back down to a statewide race (TX=12/19, MT&CO=3/20), but quickly washing out of a WH bid seems like an inauspicious start to a statewide challenge. And in Bullock's case especially national preening can't endear him to the Senate electorate.
-
-
Show this thread
-
Some invoking Paul and Rubio as evidence that one can drop down from a WH bid and win. Certainly true for an incumbent who can freeze the field, but recall both had harder fought races than they otherwise would have. Closest analogue might be Jim Gilmore, which... yikes.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yeah, in a more sensible universe he'd be doing well in the primary but this is just inexplicable.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Apart from Colorado and Montana what's the third?
-
Presumably Beto or Castro vs Cornyn.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Running for cabinet seats.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Schumer isn't doing his job. Maybe Dick Durban or Patty Murray should show him how to recruit Senate prospects
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Bullock is not interested in legislating. His closeheld preference is leadership/governance. Also, Daines is a shoo-in for re-election.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Imagine completely viable Democratic candidates against vulnerable GOP incumbents in Texas, Colorado, Arizona & Montana, and then you find out that the GOP in Alabama might nominate Roy Moore... I mean... COME ON!!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.