"than the other candidates running" Umm, that would include men and woman. Where's the sexism again?
-
-
-
Agree. Seeing this as sexist is a stretch. It is possible to opine about a diverse field of candidates w/o being sexist.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Agree. This kind of MSM forced streamlining of Dem field needs to be called out. Thank you
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Caution - we can each praise our individual Dem favorite wo running down the others, or their followers. This only divides us. Both Elizabeth and Pete are highly intelligent, and any comparison should be against the "stable genius" in office now.
-
I’m not praising my favorite or putting anyone down. I’m calling out gender bias
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Or people might want a younger person leading this country.
-
i mean maybe, but it’s a complete nonsequitur that has nothing to do with the claims being made in the original tweet
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
That's not a job requirement for POTUS. It's an excuse to favor a white male over more qualified candidates.
End of conversation
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
You call her a towering intellect, but it’s not sexist to say that Pete is “head and shoulders smarter” than everyone including her? Based on what?
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.