.@LAPublicLibrary Hey, great way to increase your book circulation—offend probably your most prolific reader/user by linking to an 1/?
Looking for a good romance novel with some substance? http://lapl.me/xICEf6r via @Guardian
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@LAPublicLibrary article that dismisses a 1.1 billion dollar industry by calling it fluff. I daresay that none of the books offered up 2/?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@LAPublicLibrary by this author are actual romances, which, by definition, all require a happily ever after. Linking to this article 3/?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@LAPublicLibrary that belittles a genre that’s predominantly for women by women is insulting to your patrons & the fact that she calls 4/?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@LAPublicLibrary her book a romance at all is lazy and dishonest. So here, a link to an article that doesn’t disparage me as a reader: 5/?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.