If you’re an anon account and disclose that you have a CFA and your region and hint at your age/sex/role, you’ve basically doxxed yourself. Information theory is tricky.
Fascinating. Credentialism is hard for me to grasp as an outsider but I guess that makes sense?
-
-
Makes complete sense. Using an institutes accreditation shouldn't come with the privilege of eluding a public scrutiny of your acts/views.
-
Why? The institute doesn't give a shit about personal purity testing Designation usage rules aside, ethics rules specifically exclude everything under a felony that's not related to a profession - they go out of their way to disclaim such scrutiny
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.