Kinda love this line of thinking b/c in companies that may be engaging in fraud there are multiple questions to ask. 1. Is fraud happening? 2. If so, is it helping the company get closer to escape velocity? 3. If it is, could the fraud actually be bullish as a passive investor?https://twitter.com/jeremymikejo/status/1223869512526659584 …
Because otherwise it probably would have been a zero and now people can sell at $650 * 0.11? Agree with your other point, though. It does all depend on where you buy... what I'm saying is that it's possible to make money trading frauds. I'm not sure why this is so controversial
-
-
The bag holders at $17 already lost majority of their investment. You believe that continuing frauds for the sake of bag holders is justified. I wish you well with your trading. When bubbles pop, they drop hard & fast. For now, the stock is divorced of fundamentals.
-
I feel like I must be misunderstanding you. Can you elaborate on that first sentence? Didn't SCTY shareholders get 0.11 shares of
$TSLA for every share they owned? - 11 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
