Hi Andrew. Which of these seems most likely to you? 1. Some secret org is handing out required talking points that must be used while covering this story. 2. I plagiarized a story published a full day after my own. 3. Stories on the same topic sometimes contain similar phrasing.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We can try this, sure, though I have an idea of how it might go: I provide you with examples, you refute the source as unreliable or say that the videos are edited for length not for content and we're not gonna see eye-to-eye on the legitimacy of the critiques.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So here's some examples of selectively edited footage that misleads the viewer: http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2010/04/just_how_heavily-edited_was_th.html … http://archives.cjr.org/campaign_desk/okeefe_teaches_media_a_lesson_again.php … http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/10/james-okeefe-scott-foval-new-47-percent-story-false/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I will cop to the fact that it has been some time since I last revisited the ACORN videos but I have seen the footage.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I believe I offered two other examples if you don't find that one to be accurate. I have a feeling we may disagree as to how to how the editing of the footage affects the final product.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah, we'll have to agree to disagree on his work but I'm glad we were able to have this discussion!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.