Aaron Van Langevelde is asking for public testimony before taking up the motion to certify Michigan's election results.pic.twitter.com/MrOpa6jX6T
Możesz dodawać lokalizację do Twoich Tweetów, jak miasto czy konkretne miejsce, z sieci lub innych aplikacji. W każdej chwili możesz usunąć historię lokalizacji swoich Tweetów. Dowiedz się więcej
I heard that one of you is planning to vote NO. "I find this shocking and disgusting." Choosing not to certify would mean that democracy is dying in Michigan. It would mean buying into idiotic and unfounded conspiracy theories. -Barb Byrum, Ingham County Bd of Electionspic.twitter.com/VqE9KV6991
Norman Shinkle suggests Republican poll workers were turned away. Janice Winfrey shoots this down. She notes that they had Republicans, they actively recruited Republicans and that they eventually had to stop recruiting when they ran out of time to train new people.pic.twitter.com/1N0UusYvu4
Monica Palmer--> the one who proposed certifying all results except those in Detroit is up. This was a racist and offensive period. She says "in heat of the moment" she didn't realize that audits can't happen before certification. Says she wouldn't have certified.pic.twitter.com/SsBFVOoxd3
BREAKING: Aaron Van Langevelde makes clear that he will be voting YES in support of certifying the Michigan election results. Notes Board must follow the law as written and must not exercise power it does not have. Board has a duty to certify the results. #Michigancertificationpic.twitter.com/ZgsbrV0tPU
Thank you for relaying the information to us all. It’s very much appreciated! It’s also great to see people speak up for the voters!
Several hundred?
I know the witnesses want to be heard. But since all seem to want to certify, they should email their testimony and meet at another time.... Or something.
Not to worry, the Board will be done by cocktail hour.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.