2/ A democratically elected leader finds himself in an ambiguous situation: he is appointed as a servant of his constituency by ballot, yet he is subsequently expected to exert robust and steady leadership over them.
-
-
9/ Consequently, the democratically elected leader instinctively attempts to make his rhetoric not sound like rhetoric: the “art of artless persuasion”. "When rhetoric becomes the king of quality is when emotion becomes the emperor of knowledge." —
@BlacklabellogicShow this thread -
10/ The democratic leader therefore must seek to persuade without sounding persuasive. He has no choice but to use words to influence people — people who are automatically skeptical of his words to begin with.
Show this thread -
11/ This is the recipe that brews the general attitudes many of us have about politicians: we can never be fully certain that they are ever telling the truth. We must suspect that every statement is just a talking point.
Show this thread -
12/ It’s all strategic jockeying, leveraging, and maneuvering for some agenda. After all, while we demand that our leaders be honest, transparent, and straight to the point, we also know that we will surely punish leaders who simplistically tell us the truth.
Show this thread -
13/ This is one of the great ironies of democracy: we elect people to be calculating and strategic leaders and spokespersons on our behalf, even while we are simultaneously suspicious of the calculating and strategic manner of speech we force them to adopt.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.