I think you're taking two extremes. Many victims of crime (in assault, rape, etc), are actually blameless. There isn't anything they could have done different if they didn't know it would happen. The problem with generalism is seeing things as either black or white.
-
-
-
You're missing the point. This isn't about about what other people choose or do. This is about what you, yourself, choose or do. Hence, this isn't about blame.
-
You can hold yourself accountable *for your own actions*, but you can also hold other people accountable for their actions *under law* when injustice has been done against you, and there is a law protecting your rights (such as a freedom from being assaulted).
-
The analogy that you are *either* a victim or a protagonist is a black and white picture. You can legitimately be a victim of a crime AND also a protagonist, by seeking justice for that crime. It's not extreme of you are never responsible or always responsible.
-
The original tweet is talking about internal choice of how to look at things. What you list here. One is an internal choice (the choice to be protagonist) and the other is an external action (seeking justice). The original tweet was only about internal choice.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Being proactive is a choice and habit of highly effective people.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Definitely we love to chose protagonists but don't you think that victim mentality and protagonists is two sides of a coin which we called emotional intelligence
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Don't be a side character in your own story!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.