and I am almost proud that I managed to not mention Henry Markram in the above tweet. @HBPBrainSim ;)
-
-
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Honestly question: if we are ever able to accurately simulate a brain, does it makes more ethical to experiment on it? I mean, it doesn't matter if it is just a simulation or the real thing, if all the processes are identical, then the simulated brain can understand pain, etc.
-
I am honestly not sure. But let me ask a friend who is a bioethicist/ neuroethicist ;)
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Simulating what one doesn’t know, with no means to cross-test with reality, has a name: wishful thinking. Perhaps a strong tool to maintain the status quo of knowledge, certainly not one to upturn it or advance it.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
-
!!!!organoids!!!!!11111!!!ELEVEN
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
But we should try to build the best simulations we can with existing data before collecting more.
-
We do not even begin to know enough to build simulations that can inform us with any accuracy about toxic effects of chemicals. Such effects can only be discovered from observations -- new data collection -- on animals. EPA is deciding those test animals will be us.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
The only thing that could ever completely replace this kind of animal research would be a combination of simulations, traditional cell culture and novel organoid technologies that don't exist yet. Even then I'm not sure. The 2035 deadline sounds absurd either way.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
