I stand by my words exactly as I wrote them: this is rare, whereas women being coerced for sex is the opposite of rare.
-
-
But add to it the moral substance of the two kinds of "coercion" are fundamentally very, very, very different.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
And that the conflation of the two in the original post - a conceit that I've brought into by taking this thread even half seriously - is spurious and offensive.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @keith_ng @lyon_anthony
Nope. Original was on involuntary unemployment and involuntary celibacy. You brought in coerced alternatives.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Involuntary unemployment is rarely relieved by a quick wank
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
You are failing in empathy
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I think it would be fair to say that I have zero empathy for people who think it's OK to feel entitled to rape and kill women.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Agree that it is evil to propose any of that as any solution.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
It's not a solution, because the problem isn't that women won't sleep with them. The problem that they are too unpleasant, and no-one is going there. Any fix would depend on them recognising that they're the problem themselves, and wanting to change that.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Back to my initial parallel with involuntary unemployment!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Not even close. Unless you're an incel, when you think that there is some conspiracy to designed to favour only the pretty people.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.