Some contenders, perhaps: @ortoiseortoise, @nathancofnas, @NSesardic
Show this thread
So how would you define "genetic group difference". Turkheimer contends that it isn't so easy as sometimes thought, and he is right about that. Heterodox philosophers, this is your chance! http://www.geneticshumanagency.org/gha/heritability-and-malleability-in-individuals-and-groups/ …pic.twitter.com/SlMQFqu0QG
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Damn, beat me by 40s while I was finding my list of contenders!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
I sketched an account of that notion in this post: https://necpluribusimpar.net/the-trouble-with-feminism/ …. It's still very sketchy for the moment, but I plan to turn the part about this question into a separate paper eventually.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If anything's a known causal mechanism in biology, it's heritability! So we accept group phenotype differences are "genetic" to the extent the phenotypes have sufficient heritability to account for the observed variance and other factors have not been shown to.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
The politicization of science forces an inversion of natural priors. We should assume everything is genetic until proven otherwise, as it turns out to be the primary factor nearly always. Political activists like Turkheimer won't allow it!
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.