liberal perceptions of "relatively a great deal". i think your interpretation goes beyond the data.
-
Ok, so I double checked. Now I am really not sure what it is and is not doing. I get 20k hits with "implicit bias". I get 1.5m hits with implicit bias. I get>3m hits with implicit. So if implicit bias (no quotes) pulls both, how can it pull less than just implicit?
Your numbers are perfectly consistent with the way Brian says. Quoting them means they have to occur next to each other, no quotes just means they both have to be there somewhere together. GS used to be advanced search that made this more clear, but was removed (dunno why).
-
-
ok, great, thanks.
-
Just for fun. :) https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=implicit+bias%2Cstereotype+accuracy%2Cstereotype+threat&year_start=1900&year_end=2008&corpus=15&smoothing=3&share=&direct_url=t1%3B%2Cimplicit%20bias%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Cstereotype%20accuracy%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Cstereotype%20threat%3B%2Cc0 …pic.twitter.com/xdRs89XTQZ
-
Tweet unavailable
-
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.