I'm not sure whether you mean binary (virgin vs non-virgin) or as a continuum (having sex with hot girls vs not as hot girls) but pretty sure that's not true either way. It's pretty important but it's not "the ultimate" measure of status.
But men know instinctually that this is true. Sexual access to women is the ultimate arbiter of male status. No way around this. Society must deal with it somehow. Choose wisely.https://twitter.com/pronounced_ing/status/997629873060540422 …
-
-
-
"Ultimate" is pretty vague, but it's true that this is the "ultimate" measure in an evolutionary sense. And unless we're talking super-rich or super-famous, it does seem like mate access tends to a massive determinant of (male) status. Mate access tends to trump other status 1/2
-
in a way too. E.g. we pity "rich but died alone", or "genius but celibate" in a way that we don't pity "average but died married", and pointing out virginity / celibacy can damage even men highest in other status markers. /end
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Can't just "raise" people to believe whatever we prefer
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Women believe low-quality men aren't entitled to women, while at the same time believe low-quality women are entitled to high-quality men! Hypergamy in action!pic.twitter.com/t4QYl4Q2UN
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.